Anita Menzies

Anita Menzies Founder – Integrated Property & Project Consultant Barrister & Solicitor | Architecture & Law (University of Auckland) Anita Menzies is the founder of Aamsko and a category-defining voice in New Zealand’s property and construction sector. She has pioneered an integrated advisory model that unifies legal, technical, and commercial disciplines—challenging the fragmented, multi-consultant approach that has traditionally defined the industry. With dual qualifications in Architecture and Law from the University of Auckland, and former experience as Head of Commercial Property at one of Auckland’s largest firms, Anita operates at the intersection of design, regulation, and commercial strategy. Her work is grounded in a fundamental belief: that the most complex property problems cannot be solved within silos. Anita specialises in resolving highly complex weathertightness and structural issues, particularly cases that have stalled, escalated, or resisted conventional approaches. By integrating legal insight, building science, and commercial reality into a single strategic framework, she identifies solutions where others cannot—bringing clarity to issues that are often considered intractable. Through Aamsko, Anita has established a new standard of advisory: one that replaces fragmentation with alignment, reduces risk at its source, and delivers outcomes that are technically sound, legally robust, and commercially durable. Her approach not only resolves individual projects, but redefines how complex property challenges are understood and solved across the sector.

Cross‑Lease Alterations: Court of Appeal Brings Common Sense Back to Consent

Cross‑Lease Alterations Explained: Court of Appeal Ruling Every Auckland Property Owner Should Know

By

If you own property under a cross‑lease title, chances are you will eventually run into the consent issue. It usually arises at exactly the wrong time — when you are planning renovations, looking at redevelopment, or trying to future‑proof an ageing home. In Auckland, where cross‑leases remain a feature of older residential suburbs, this issue …

Cross‑Lease Alterations Explained: Court of Appeal Ruling Every Auckland Property Owner Should Know Read More »

Leaky Building Remediation and Tax: What Inland Revenue’s Updated Guidance Means for Property Owners in New Zealand

By

Leaky Building Remediation and Tax: What Inland Revenue’s Updated Guidance Means for Property Owners in New Zealand. Most property owners approaching leaky building remediation ask the same question first: how much will it cost? Fewer ask whether that cost is deductible. Inland Revenue’s updated guidance published in March 2026 makes that second question unavoidable. Interpretation …

Leaky Building Remediation and Tax: What Inland Revenue’s Updated Guidance Means for Property Owners in New Zealand Read More »

showing how construction lawyers navigate construction contracts in leaky building projects.

NZS 3910:2023 or NEC3: Which Construction Contract Is Right for Leaky Building Remediation?

By

NZS 3910:2023 or NEC3? Choosing the Right Contract for Leaky Building Remediation (Before Things Get Messy) Let’s be honest. No one starts a leaky building remediation project thinking:“I can’t wait to spend the next two years arguing about variations, delays, and who’s paying for what.” Yet that’s exactly where many projects end up. And more …

NZS 3910:2023 or NEC3: Which Construction Contract Is Right for Leaky Building Remediation? Read More »

On 23 April 2026, New Zealand's Parliament passed the second reading of the Building and Construction Sector (Self-Certification by Plumbers and Drainlayers) Amendment Bill. The reform is the latest in a sustained government programme to reduce friction in the building consent system, and it will have direct practical consequences for building owners, body corporates, and anyone managing a construction or remediation project where plumbing and drainage work is involved. This article sets out what the scheme actually does, where the accountability shifts, and what building owners should be thinking about now. What the Scheme Does The Bill introduces a voluntary self-certification pathway for licensed plumbers and drainlayers who hold an approved endorsement from the Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board. Under the scheme, an endorsed practitioner carries out defined plumbing and drainlaying work — work that is routine, low-risk, and not complex — and then issues a Certificate of Compliance directly to the building owner and the Board, without a Building Consent Authority inspection taking place. The Building Consent Authority continues to check that plans comply with the Building Code at consent stage. But once work begins, the endorsed practitioner takes full responsibility for verifying that the completed work matches the consent. The BCA must accept the Certificate of Compliance as evidence of compliance and will not conduct an inspection. The scheme originally focused on straightforward residential work such as bathroom installations. Following Select Committee feedback, the scope has been expanded to cover the majority of residential plumbing and drainlaying work, along with some commercial activity — including kitchenettes in small commercial premises — and onsite systems such as septic tanks and stormwater retention tanks in rural and urban areas. The scheme applies to buildings up to three storeys, excluding apartments, where standard building designs are used and fire-rated or shared walls are not affected. Practitioners who wish to self-certify must hold a current licence, maintain good standing with the Board, hold civil liability insurance, and meet technical competency criteria. Their endorsement must be renewed every three years. A public register of endorsed practitioners will be maintained. Where Accountability Shifts The productivity argument for this reform is well-grounded. Inspection delays have been a genuine constraint on the building sector, and removing mandatory inspections for low-risk, routine work frees BCA resource for more complex, higher-risk jobs. What the reform does not change is the underlying legal standard. Work must still comply with the Building Code and the building consent. If it does not, the building owner has a defect. The question is what the pathway to remedy looks like when no independent inspection has occurred. Under the existing system, a BCA inspection provides third-party verification at key stages. If defective work passes an inspection, questions of council liability can arise alongside contractor liability. Under self-certification, the practitioner's Certificate of Compliance becomes the primary — and often only — contemporaneous evidence that the work was completed correctly. If a defect emerges later, the building owner's practical and legal position depends heavily on: The content and quality of the Certificate of Compliance The testing results, photographs, and as-built documentation included with it Whether the work was correctly categorised as eligible for self-certification The practitioner's professional indemnity and civil liability cover The practitioner's continuing standing with the Board These are not barriers to the scheme working well. They are the conditions that need to be understood and actively managed. Practical Considerations for Building Owners and Project Managers For body corporates, commercial building owners, property developers, and anyone managing a capital or remediation programme, the introduction of self-certification suggests a small number of straightforward responses. Know what is being self-certified. On any project involving plumbing and drainage work, confirm with your contractor or project manager which specific work items are being self-certified and which remain subject to BCA inspection. This is not onerous, but it should be documented. Retain all Certificates of Compliance. The Certificate of Compliance, including any attached testing results and photographs, should be retained as part of the building's long-term documentation. For body corporates and asset managers, this documentation supports future condition assessments, long-term maintenance planning, and insurance or legal purposes. Understand the endorsement requirements. Only practitioners who are licensed, in good standing, and endorsed by the Board can self-certify. Before engaging a plumber or drainlayer on a self-certification basis, confirm their status on the public register. This is a reasonable and straightforward due diligence step. Consider whether independent oversight remains appropriate. Self-certification is designed for low-risk, routine work. On complex remediation projects — particularly where plumbing and drainage intersects with weathertightness elements, concrete structures, or shared building services — the case for independent construction monitoring or quality assurance remains strong regardless of the self-certification regime. The Wider Context This reform sits within a broader government building reform programme that has also introduced a second private Building Consent Authority, expanded product acceptance from overseas markets, and reformed the earthquake-prone building system. The cumulative direction is clear: reduce regulatory friction, lift productivity, and place greater responsibility on licensed practitioners. That direction is reasonable. But for building owners and their advisers, each reform carries implications for how risk is managed and where documentation, oversight, and accountability need to be maintained. The answer is not to resist reform, but to understand it clearly and adjust project management and documentation practices accordingly. In Summary The Self-Certification by Plumbers and Drainlayers Bill is expected to be enacted before Parliament rises for the general election. When it takes effect, BCA inspections for defined plumbing and drainage work will cease. The Certificate of Compliance issued by the endorsed practitioner will carry the evidentiary weight. For building owners and those managing construction projects, the practical response is to stay informed, document thoroughly, and ensure that independent oversight is maintained where the technical or financial risk justifies it.

Self-Certification for Plumbers and Drainlayers: What Building Owners, Body Corporates and Developers Need to Know

By

Self-Certification for Plumbers and Drainlayers: What Building Owners, Body Corporates and Developers Need to Know On 23 April 2026, New Zealand’s Parliament passed the second reading of the Building and Construction Sector (Self-Certification by Plumbers and Drainlayers) Amendment Bill. The reform is the latest in a sustained government programme to reduce friction in the building …

Self-Certification for Plumbers and Drainlayers: What Building Owners, Body Corporates and Developers Need to Know Read More »

Liability During Leaky Building Remediation What B

Liability During Leaky Building Remediation: What Building Owners and Body Corporates Must Understand

By

Liability During Leaky Building Remediation: What Building Owners and Body Corporates Must Understand When a building is leaking, most owners quite rightly want one thing: to stop the water and move on. In Auckland, particularly, leaky building remediation is often urgent, expensive, and emotionally draining. The instinct is to fix the problem as quickly as …

Liability During Leaky Building Remediation: What Building Owners and Body Corporates Must Understand Read More »

building-consent-reforms-nz-2026-fast-track-liability

New Building Consent Reforms: What New Zealand Property Owners and Developers Need to Know

By

New Building Consent Reforms: What New Zealand Property Owners and Developers Need to Know April 2026 marks a pivotal moment for New Zealand’s construction industry. A new package of building consent reforms has come into force, introducing faster approval pathways, mandatory digital processing, and significantly tougher liability settings. Together, these changes will reshape how building …

New Building Consent Reforms: What New Zealand Property Owners and Developers Need to Know Read More »

Worker rappelling from a building, performing a building survey for the building surveyor team at Aamsko.

Harbour Royal Weathertightness Survey | Aamsko Auckland

By

Harbour Royal Apartments – Aamsko’s Weathertightness Documentation & Diagnostic Process Project: 88 Anzac Avenue, Auckland CBDClient: Body Corporate 170878Consultants: Aamsko (NZ Property Practice Ltd) and Zenith Facilities Services Ltd At Harbour Royal Apartments—an eleven-storey residential complex in the heart of Auckland’s CBD—the passing of time had begun to reveal early weathertightness vulnerabilities. Built in 1995 …

Harbour Royal Weathertightness Survey | Aamsko Auckland Read More »

leaky building

Weathertightness Remediation | Leaky Building Repair at Broadway, Newmarket

By

Leaky Building Remediation at XXX Broadway, Newmarket In the heart of Newmarket, Auckland, XXX Broadway stands as one of the suburb’s most prominent commercial office buildings. Known for housing a mix of law firms, consultancies, and other professional tenants, the building had, in recent years, begun to show signs of age—not in its aesthetic, but …

Weathertightness Remediation | Leaky Building Repair at Broadway, Newmarket Read More »

construction contract conditions for New Zealand used by construction lawyer to navigate construction law.

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNDER NZS 3910:2023

By

Navigating Construction Project Management Under NZS 3910:2023: A Comprehensive Guide In the world of construction, managing projects effectively is crucial to ensuring successful outcomes. New Zealand’s NZS 3910:2023 contract provides a robust framework designed to streamline project management, mitigate risks, and promote collaboration. As construction projects become more complex, understanding and leveraging the provisions of …

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNDER NZS 3910:2023 Read More »